It’s kinda funny that the Spider-Verse movies are such bangers when the actual Spider-Verse arc in the comics was like. kind of shit. Like it introduced Spider-Gwen and I’ll always love it for that but the actual arc itself was nothing to write home about
Like the actual plot of Spider-Verse in the comics is that there’s like an ancient immortal space vampire who eats spider-people so all the spider-people across dimensions have to team up to stop him but only the Real 616 Peter Parker can Truly save the day because he’s the Most Special. Miles is like, a bit-player in this. It’s mostly just a bombastic nonsense excuse to show different variants of Spider-Man getting murked.
The movie adapts way more from Miles’ Ultimate Spider-Man origin as well as the Spider-Men book
Was that the same event that erased the Ultimate Universe and transferred Miles to 616 or was that something else?
Nah that was Secret Wars, that was a lot later.
comic book fans could make up literally anything and claim it happened in a run and like 90% of the audience would have no choice to take their word. Y'all should use this power less responsibly
There’s a parallel version of Spider-Man who’s a car and his name is Peter Parkedcar
@demilypyro You think you’re being funny, but that is not more psychotic than Peter Porker, the Spectacular Spider-Ham, which is canon, and strongly supports alys’ argument.
- Do you know enough about the all worlds religions to make a potentially harmful generalization about all of them?
- Are you making assumptions about other religions based off of your experience with one religion?
- Are you making assumptions about other religions and cultures based on your limited experience with a single person or group of people from said religion or culture?
- Are you taking out your valid frustrating, anger, hurt, and pain with one religious group on people who have nothing to do with it by making a generalization?
If you don’t actually mean the every single one of the vast, diverse, multi-faceted religions in the world, don’t make a blanket statement and list the one(s) you mean specifically. This also goes for using ‘grouping’ labels that do not apply, like Abrahamic, etc.
Don’t say “religion” when you mean “Abrahamic.”
Don’t say “Abrahamic” if you mean “Judeo-Christian.”
Don’t say “Judeo-Christian” when you mean “Christian.”
Don’t say “Christian” when you mean “Protestant.”
Don’t say “Protestant” when you mean “Fundamentalist.”
There is 0 legitimate reason to use the term “Judeo-Christian.” it’s a meaningless term. There is never any Judaism involved when that term is in play. we have to stop sceding ground to the fundamentalists - Christians are not “grafted in” and Judaism is not “Christianity lite.”
never getting over how genuinely distressed tai lung looks when po does his shuffling trick. mid fight this man stops and panics because he cant figure out a childrens magic trick